Neurosurgery notes/Cervical Deformity Frailty Index

Cervical Deformity Frailty Index 

View Details
Status
Done

Reference

Aim

  • Stratifies cervical deformity patients into frailty categories that meaningfully predict risk of major and medical complications after surgery, beyond age or CCI alone

Components

Physician-documented deficits

  • More than 3 medical problems
  • Anxiety
  • BMI <18.5 or >30
  • Cancer
  • Cardiac disease
  • Cerebrovascular disease
  • Current disability benefits
  • Dementia
  • Depression
  • Diabetes
  • Liver disease
  • Lung disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Osteoporosis
  • Pancreatic disease
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Smoker
  • Vascular disease
  • Venous disease
  • Unsteady gait

Patient-reported / questionnaire-derived deficits

  • Bladder incontinence
  • Bowel incontinence
  • Difficulty driving (NDI Q8)
  • Difficulty getting dressed (mJOA)
  • Difficulty reading (LSDI Q4)
  • Difficulty sleeping more than 6 hours (LSDI Q9; SWAL-QOL Q9b/d)
  • Difficulty walking without an assistive device (mJOA)
  • Feeling anxious or depressed most of the time (EQ-5D-3L)
  • Feeling tired most of the time (SWAL-QOL Q9c)
  • Feeling weak most of the time (SWAL-QOL Q9a)
  • Feeling worn out or exhausted most of the time (SWAL-QOL Q9e)
  • General health <50 on EQ VAS
  • Inability to concentrate (LSDI Q6)
  • Inability to do normal work/schoolwork/housework (NDI Q7)
  • Inability to engage in normal recreational activity (LSDI Q10)
  • Inability to lift heavy objects (LSDI Q3)
  • Inability to perform normal activities (EQ-5D-3L)
  • Inability to walk (EQ-5D-3L)
  • Leg weakness
  • Personal care dependency (LSDI Q2)

Scoring

  • Based on a proportion out of 40 (max score)
  • Frail (<0.2)
  • Frail (0.2–0.4)
  • Severely frail (>0.4) 

Outcome

  • Severely frail patients having markedly higher odds of a major complication than not-frail patients (OR 43, 95% CI 2.7–684 on multivariate analysis).
  • Frailty correlates with medical complications (gamma 0.30) but not clearly with surgical/technical complications, suggesting it reflects systemic vulnerability rather than operative difficulty per se