Neurosurgery notes/Procedures/Implants/Anterior column spinal implants

Anterior column spinal implants

View Details

Anterior column spinal implants in the thoracolumbar spine may be broadly classified as extracolumnar or intracolumnar.

Extracolumnar implants

  • consist of vertebral body screws connected to a longitudinal member (plate or a rod) located on the external aspect of the vertebral body spanning one or more adjacent vertebral motion segments.
  • Screws enter the lateral aspect of the vertebral body in a coronal plane trajectory (except at L5/S1 where placed in anteroposterior direction due to vessels):
    • Anterior plate systems:
      • Pros
        • Indication include tumors, burst fractures, and degenerative spinal disorders requiring anterior fusion over one or two levels;
      • Cons (not to used)
        • When significant coronal or sagittal plane deformity exists (as deformity must be corrected before plate application)
        • When multiple anterior vertebral segments require fixation.
      • See
    • Anterior rod systems:
      • Pros
        • Help correct deformity
          • In short-segment spinal problems with deformity, anterior rod systems permit corrective forces to be applied directly to spinal segments by distraction, thereby restoring spinal alignment (and facilitating placement of intracolumnar implant).
        • Subsequent compression of the anterior graft or cage restores anterior load sharing and enhances arthrodesis.
      • In long-segment spinal problems (e.g. scoliosis) single or double rod systems can be used.

Intracolumnar implants

  • consist of implants that reside within the contour of the vertebral bodies that are capable of bearing loads:
    • Autografts
      • Pros
        • Highest rate of fusion success
      • Cons
        • Significant donor site morbidity.
    • Allografts
      • Pros
        • Good early strength
        • Avoids donor site morbidity
      • Cons
        • Slower/lower fusion rate compared with autograft and donor tissue
        • infectious risk.
    • Cage devices
      • Pros
        • possess excellent strength
        • provide the advantage of mechanical interdigitation with vertebral bone (reducing dislodgement)
        • Can be filled with cancellous autograft, allograft, or biologic agents (e.g. bone morphogenetic proteins) to promote fusion.
      • Cons
        • Cage devices may subside into the vertebral bodies (loss of anterior column height)
        • radiographic assessment of fusion can be difficult in their presence.
  • Subtype
    • Static
      • Cage dimensions determined prior to implantation
    • Expandable
      • Possess capacity for expansion following implantation to optimize stability