Grade 2 osteotomy

View Details
Status
Done
  • Indication
    • Long, gradual, rounded kyphosis eg Scheuermann kyphosis.
    • Apex of a rigid coronal curve to enhance curve flexibility and correction.
      • Osteotomy creates a window through which the pedicles can be palpated for more confident screw insertion.
  • Degree of kyphotic correction
    • 9.3–10.7° per level.
    • 1°/mm of bone resected.
  • Surgical Principles
    • Require a mobile disc space anteriorly.
      • Disc space typically compresses posteriorly and expands anteriorly with a fulcrum between
      • Uses the disc space as a fulcrum to effect anterior column lengthening and posterior column shortening.
    • Removal of the
      • Posterior ligaments (supraspinous, intraspinous, and ligamentum flavum) AND
      • Facets to produce a posterior release
    • For coronal correction and sagittal plane realignment.
      • Compression of the osteotomy brings about kyphosis correction.
        • Compression leads to contraction of the neural foramina, which necessitates a preceding wide facetectomy to prevent nerve root impingement.
  • Outcome
    • Cho 2005:
      • 3x SPOs = 1x PSO interms of sagittal correction with half the blood loss
      • 10.7° of sagittal correction per level.
    • Blood loss tends to be less.
      • Cho 2005: Average blood loss
        • SPO: 1392 ml
        • PSO: 2617 ml
    • Fusion rates
    • ODI
    • Sagittal plane imbalance correction
      • Cho 2005: PSO>SPO
      • (≥ 3 SPOs 5.49 ± 4.5 vs PSO 11.19 ± 7.2 [p < 0.01])
    • Greater coronal decompensation
  • Complication in SPO>PSO
notion image
notion image
notion image
  • In AIS
    • Primarily used to improve sagittal plane mobility, especially in cases of hypokyphosis (<20°) or hyperkyphosis (>40°).
    • Studies have shown significant improvements in thoracic kyphosis (e.g., from 8.1° to 18.3° for hypokyphosis, or reduced from 45° to 26° for hyperkyphosis).
    • Can achieve greater thoracic Cobb angle correction (e.g., 67.1% vs. 61.8%) and better rib prominence correction (e.g., 53.2% vs. 38.4%) compared to Grade 1 osteotomies in some studies.
    • Associated with increased surgical complexity, including higher estimated blood loss and longer operative time compared to Grade 1 osteotomies.
    • Indications:
      • Typically reserved for patients with thoracic sagittal plane deformities (e.g., hypokyphosis < 10° or hyperkyphosis > 40°) or severe, rigid coronal deformities (>70–90°) with limited flexibility (>40° on dynamic imaging).