3 main concepts of spinopelvic fixation
- Lumbosacral Pivot Point (McCord et al., 1992)
- Definition:
- The pivot point is at the center of the osteoligamentous column between the last lumbar vertebra (usually L5) and the sacrum.
- It represents the "instantaneous axis of rotation" for lumbosacral biomechanics.
- Construct stability increases as the fixation progresses more ventral to the pivot point
- Zones of Sacropelvic Fixation (O’Brien et al., 2004)
- Zone 1: S1 vertebral body and cephalad margins of sacral alae
- Zone 2: Inferior margins of sacral alae, S2, and area extending to the tip of the coccyx
- Zone 3: Both iliac bones
- Implications: Extending fixation to more caudal and lateral zones (especially Zone 3, the ilium) provides greater construct stability
- Triangulation of Screws
- Directing pedicle screws medially for better pullout strength: triangulation increases the biomechanical strength of constructs by converging screws in a triangular orientation across multiple cortical layers.
Indications for Sacropelvic Fixation
Long fusions | Adult degenerative Scoliosis, Neuromuscular Scoliosis, Paralytic curves. |
Spondylolisthesis | High grade slips |
Deformity | Kyphotic deformity especially in cases of Ankylosed spine, Pelvic obliquity |
Fractures | Sacral and sacropelvic fractures |
Osteotomy | Osteotomies in lower lumbar spine |
Others | Pseudarthrosis, Tumors, Lumbosacral dislocations, Osteomyelitis |
Techniques and Construct Variations
Types of Sacropelvic Fixation
Zone | Technique/Implant |
Zone 1 | Sacral (S1) tricortical screws, S1 pedicle screws |
Zone 2 | Sacral alar screws, S2 pedicle screws, Sacral intrasacral rods |
Zone 3 | Iliac screws, S2-iliac screws, S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws |
Key Points:
- Multiple points of fixation using rods, cross-linking, and anterior column support improve stability.
- Construct should aim for maximum purchase across these zones to resist physiological loading.
Positioning and Operative Reminders
- Iliac crests must be symmetrical.
- Adequate draping for lateral and distal access.
- Ensure unobstructed imaging.
- Mispositioning alters pelvic parameters.
Avoidance Zones:
- Avoid placing screws near the (to prevent neurovascular injury)
- Facies auricularis
- Crista sacralis medialis
- Anterior sacral foramen
Traditional sacropelvic fixation
Current Methods of Sacropelvic Fixation8910
Feature | Traditional Iliac Screw | Anatomic Iliac Screw | Subcrestal Iliac Screw | S2-Alar-Iliac (S2AI) Screw | S1 Pedicle Screw | Sacral Alar Screw |
Entry Point | At or near Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS) | Medial/caudal to PSIS, often in line with S1 pedicle screws | Medial aspect of iliac crest, inferior & medial to PSIS, beneath crest (subcrestal) | Between S1 and S2 dorsal sacral foramina, just lateral to the lateral sacral crest | Inferior border of superior facet of S1, base of the “V” sign | Lateral/inferior to S1 pedicle, into sacral ala |
Trajectory | Lateral & slightly anterior toward Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine (AIIS) | Similar to traditional but in-line with S1 pedicle screws, toward AIIS | Lateromedial, deep under crest, parallel/sightly convergent with S1 screw, avoiding SI joint | Directed lateral and caudal—crossing sacral ala, SI joint, into ilium—aimed at AIIS | 30° medial, toward the sacral promontory | Lateral/anterior, through the sacral ala |
Advantages | - Strong biomechanical fixation- Long screw length- Familiar technique | - Low profile/less prominence- Easier rod connection (inline)- Less muscle dissection | - Nearly eliminates prominence- Minimal muscle disruption- Easier rod connection- Reduced wound complications | - Very low profile- Minimal soft tissue dissection- Rods align in-line with cephalad constructs- Lower implant prominence and wound issues- Avoids need for offset connectors- Better patient tolerance, especially in thin individuals | Strong fixation, large screw size, familiar, good biomechanics | Alternative when pedicles not usable; quick for fx |
Disadvantages | - Prominent head can cause pain/skin breakdown- Offset connectors often needed- Extensive muscle dissection | - Shorter trajectory than traditional- Some risk of prominence | - Technically demanding- Must avoid SI joint violation- Less familiar technique | - Technically complex learning curve- Potential SI joint violation- May require fluoroscopy or navigation- Risk of neurological or vascular injury with incorrect placement | Risk of nerve or vessel injury; exposed hardware if prominent | Lower strength; shorter/smaller screw; precision needed |
Sacral Fixation:
S1 Pedicle Screws
- Entry Point:
- Inferior border of the superior facet of S1 vertebra, typically close to the lateral aspect but can vary based on patient anatomy.
- The entry is identified medially by the base of the "V" sign—formed by the lateral border of the superior articulating process and the sacral ala
- Trajectory:
- 30° medial angulation, directed towards the sacral promontory. The screw path travels through the S1 pedicle into the vertebral body, generally parallel or slightly cranial to the S1 endplate
- Pros:
- Strong fixation due to dense trabecular bone
- Large pedicle diameter accommodates larger screws
- Familiar technique for most spine surgeons
- Good biomechanical stability for most cases3
S2 pedicle screw
- S2 pedicle screw insertion raises a theoretical possibility of increasing the strength of fixation by supplementing S1 pedicle screws
- Not recommended as it doesn’t offer any significant advantage.
- S2 pedicles are dorsal to the sacral pivot (McCord point) and hence are unable to give any biomechanical advantage.8
Sacral Alar Screws
- General
- Sacral alar screws are usually unicortical screws taking the purchase laterally in the cancellous sacral ala.
- Alar screws are used as supplemental fixations by many surgeons.
- Entry Point:
- between the S1 and 2 foramina.
- Trajectory:
- Directed laterally and anteriorly through the sacral ala.
- 35 - 40 degree laterally
- Cephalad 15 - 20
- End point
- do not breech the anterior cortex as it can injury the L5 nerve
- Pros:
- Increases construct strength and stability when combined with S1 screws
- Lower implant profile than iliac screws (less hardware prominence)
- Avoids additional soft tissue dissection required by iliac screws
- Does not interfere with iliac bone graft harvest
- Lower risk of wound complications (compared to more prominent implants)
- Placement can be done via a single midline incision
- No need for offset connectors or separate fascial incisions
- Avoids sacroiliac joint violation if placed correctly
- Easier removal or salvage in cases of infection compared to iliac screws
- High fusion rates observed in the study (solid fusion in 12 out of 13 cases)
- Cons:
- Provides less lateral/pelvic support than iliac screw fixation
- Not as biomechanically robust for severe deformities or highly unstable constructs
- Technically demanding placement with precise angulation needed (30–35° lateral, 15–20° cranial)
- Risk of injury to L5 nerve root or internal iliac vessels if screw breaches anterior cortex or sacroiliac joint
- Limited long-term and large-scale data on biomechanical performance compared to iliac screws
- Ref
Iliac Fixation:
General
- Derivation of Galvenston technique
- Entry point at PSIS
- Directed towards ASIS
- Lateral and caudal direction
- Done with fluoroscopy guidance
Iliac screws different entry points:
Traditional
A free hand technique no need fluoroscopy until the end to check. When performing this screw can skip S1 pedicle screw
Incision made based on MIS technique for the L5 screw and extend incision so that screw is inserted in a mini open fashion.
- Entry:
- At PSIS.
- The PSIS is osteotomized to prevent prominence of the screw head
- Trajectory:
- Directed toward the ASIS or Greater trochanter
- Traversing thick bone above the sciatic notch.
- Screw
- Diameter is 7.0 or 8.0 mm.
- Pros:
- Maximizes screw length and purchase
- Reliable biomechanical support.
- Cons:
- Often prominent →
- increased soft tissue disruption,
- risk of local pain and wound dehiscence,
- Necessitating additional connectors
- PSIS needs to be removed → more pain
Anatomic
- Aks Subcrestal screw
- Exposure:
- Perform a subperiosteal dissection to expose the inner table of the iliac crest and identify the PSIS.
- Less tissue dissection is required than in conventional methods since the entire iliac crest does not need to be fully exposed.
- Entry:
- Located 2–3cm caudal to the PSIS (posterior superior iliac spine), just below the S1 sacral foramen.
- Caudal and medial to PSIS, flush with the S1 screw head.
- This point sits 1.5–2cm beneath the iliac crest and above the SI joint, on the medial wall of the iliac crest.
- It is more caudal and medial than the traditional entry point and aligns better with the lumbar pedicles.
- The more caudal position places this screw in a wider cross-section of bone above the sciatic notch.
- Trajectory:
- The screw is aimed caudally (35–45°) and laterally toward the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) or greater trochanter, following a trajectory similar to traditional iliac screws.
- The trajectory is refined with tactile feedback: the tip should feel central in cancellous bone between the hard cortices of the crest.
- The goal is to get a screw passage within 1.5 to 2 cm above the sciatic notch
- Screw
- Diameter is 7.0 or 8.0 mm.
- Preparation:
- Create a pilot hole with a ball-tip burr at the entry.
- Use a straight long awl to deepen the pathway, following the planned angle.
- Verification:
- Confirm central placement with the "teardrop" radiographic view.
- Check the screw track for breaches using a guidewire.
- Insertion & Fixation:
- The screw track is under-tapped by one size.
- Use a fully threaded, polyaxial screw (≥7mm diameter, ≥75mm length preferred).
- Plan S1 screws to be in-line with the subcrestal screw for easy, direct rod attachment without side-connectors.
- Rod Engagement:
- Optionally, use a MIS (minimally invasive) tubular sleeve as a reduction device to facilitate screw-rod engagement by cantilever reduction from caudal to cephalad.
- Pros:
- Near-complete elimination of screw/prominence complications,
- Seamless rod connection
- Avoids gluteal muscle stripping
- Can reduce construct complexity
- No SI joint violation
- less chance of iatrogenic fractures
- Free-Hand Technique:
- Can be inserted without fluoroscopy, unlike S2AI, which reduces radiation exposure.
- Cons:
- More challenging technique
- Must respect unique pelvic anatomy
- Ref:
Sacral
- Entry:
- At the inferolateral aspect of the S1 foramen.
- Trajectory:
- Screw
- Diameter is 7.0 or 8.0 mm.