Neurosurgery notes/Spine/Deformity/Classification-Spinal deformity/Ames: Cervical spine deformity classification system

Ames: Cervical spine deformity classification system

View Details

General

  • A modified Delphi approach was used to develop the classification
 
 D = double; L = lordosis; N = none; T = thoracic.
D = double; L = lordosis; N = none; T = thoracic.

5 modifiers

C2 SVA
  • Measurement
    • Global
      • Centroid of C2 (or odontoid) plumb line ↔ posterior superior corner of sacrum
    • Regional
      • C2-7 SVA
        • Centroid of C2 (or odontoid) plumb line ↔ posterior superior corner of C7
        • Tang 2015: C2–7 SVA threshold of 4 cm was found to correlate with moderate disability based on the NDI
  • The T1 slope is a predictor of C2–C7 SVA.
  • Has been directly correlated with HRQOL (SF36)
    • Larger C2 SVA poorer HRQOL
    • Increasing C2 SVA (>40 mm) is correlated with worse outcomes as assessed by the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
  • Normal Cervical SVA Values in Asymptomatic Adults
    • Odontoid marker at C7
      15.6 ± 11.2 mm
      Odontoid marker at sacrum
      13.2 ± 29.5 mm
notion image
Horizontal Gaze: Chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA)
  • Measurements
    • Positioning
      • Patient standing with hips and knees extended
      • Neck is in a neutral or fixed position.
    • Photos
      • Angle
        • patient’s chin to brow
        • vertical line
    • Xrays
      • Angle
        • A line from Chin to forehead
        • A vertical line
  • CBVA of 10° has been described as an optimal target.
    • overcorrection of CBVA had a negative impact,
  • Significantly impacts activities of daily living.
  • Correction considering CBVA has been linked to positive postoperative outcomes:
    • Improved gaze
    • Ambulation
    • Activities of daily living
  • Normal CBVA has not been characterised, but postoperative values of +10 ° to −10 ° have been well tolerated in patients
notion image
notion image
notion image
Clinical analysis of global and cervical deformity using the chin–brow vertical angle (CBVA) and assess- ment of hip extension angle in standing position with knees extended (left and middle). Patients are asked to flex at the knees to achieve horizontal visual axis and the knee flexion angle is assessed
Clinical analysis of global and cervical deformity using the chin–brow vertical angle (CBVA) and assess- ment of hip extension angle in standing position with knees extended (left and middle). Patients are asked to flex at the knees to achieve horizontal visual axis and the knee flexion angle is assessed
Tetreault 2017 mJOA
Severity
mJOA
Mild
15-17
Moderate
12-14
Severe
0-11
notion image
T1 Slope
  • The T1 slope will determine the amount of subaxial lordosis required to maintain the COG of the head in a balanced position
  • Varies depending on Global spinal alignment as measured by
    • SVA AND
    • Inherent upper thoracic kyphosis (TK).
  • In patients with scoliosis, the T1 slope has been shown to correlate directly with SVA measured from the C2 odontoid plumb line to provide a measure of overall sagittal alignment.
  • Kim 2013: High preoperative T1 slope were more likely to have postoperative (Laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy) kyphotic changes at 2-years
  • Tamai 2018: Not easily visualised on xray so use C7 slope as surrogate
    • As only 18% of the T1 slope is visible
  • T1 Slope - C2-C7 lordorsis
      • Similar to PI - LL
      Score
      TS-CL
      0
      < 15°
      1
      15°–20°
      2
      > 20°
      • T1 slope minus Cervical Lordosis (TS-CL)
        • Low: <26°
        • Moderate: 26° to 45°
        • Severe: >45°
        • A postoperative T1-CL > 20 degrees correlates with greater postoperative cSVA, indicating higher risk of persistent deformity
      • C2–C7 Lordosis
        • Low: >3°
        • Moderate: -21° to 3°
        • Severe: <-21°
      notion image

Passias 2021 modifiers

  • Modifers made because the Ames classification is not built on radiological or clinical severity. Rather it is used as a communication tool to describe cervical deformity. The Passias modifiers aim to correlate the below parameters with mild, moderate and severe scores of the mJOA.
McGregor’s Slope (MGS)
  • Measurement
    • is the angle between the posterior edge of the hard palate ↔ the caudal aspect of the occiput
    • McGregor’s line (number 1)
      • extends from the hard palate to the most caudal point of the occipital curve
      • dental tip should by less than 5 mm above this line.
      • McGregor has modified chamberlain's line for when the opisthion cannot be identified.
      • On CT and MRI the normal odontoid tip is 0.8mm (± 2.4) above the line
  • A surrogate for CBVA, which can be diffcult to visualize on standing radiographs.
  • Clinical significance
    • MGS < 2.16 degrees has been suggested as a goal for for CSD correction,
    • MGS of < 0 has been proposed as modier for CSD classication.
    • A high MGS is pathologic, as MGS ≥ 20 is an inclusion criteria for cervical deformity in ISSG studies.
    • Passias 2021 modifier
      • Low: >-9° and <0°
      • Moderate: -12° to -9° or 0° to 19°
      • Severe: <-12° or >19°
C2–T3 SVA Angle
  • Measures both cervical and upper-thoracic alignment,
    • Unlike the traditional C2-7 SVA
  • Higher values corresponding to more lordosis.
  • Clinical significance
    • Passias 2021
      • Low: >-25°
      • Moderate: -35° to -25°
      • Severe: <-35°
    • C2-T3 angle <−25 degrees is associated with more severe myelopathy per the modi ed Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale.
    • A high C2-T3 angle may signify compensatory cervical lordosis in the setting of insufficient sagittal correction and may predict DJK.
  • C2 Slope
    • Passias 2021 modifiers
      • Low: <33°
      • Moderate: 33° to 49°
      • Severe: >49°
    • Clinical significance
      • Surrogate for T1-CL Mismatch: It acts as a simplified, single-value measure reflecting the degree of T1 slope-cervical lordosis (T1-CL) mismatch.
      • Correlation with HQROLs:
        • A greater C2 slope (specifically 17–38 degrees) is associated with worse health-related quality of life (HQROLs).
      • Classification Modifier:
        • It has been proposed as a novel modifier to the Ames classification system for CSD.
      • Surgical Target for Correction:
        • A goal correction of C2 slope to less than 10 degrees has been proposed as a surgical target.
      • Prediction and Prevention of DJK:
        • Failure to correct C2 slope to less than 10 degrees is a radiographic predictor of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK).
        • Achieving this target is associated with lower rates of DJK.
        • Some surgical approaches prioritise correcting C2 slope to less than 10 degrees to achieve optimal clinical outcomes.
          • Benzel: when positioning head for CVJ fusion make sure C2 slope is 90 deg to the floor.
      • Insight into Deformity Drivers:
        • It provides insight into the primary "driver" of the cervical deformity; for example, a low C2 slope with high T1 slope suggests a thoracolumbar issue, while the opposite indicates a primary cervical pathology.
  • Frailty - ASD - FI
    • Low: <0.18
    • Moderate: 0.18 to 0.27
    • Severe: >0.27
notion image