Spondylolisthesis

Assessment

  • Spinopelvic parameters
    • 36 inch radiograph AP and lateral
    • Ensure knees straight
    • Arms up : to prevent anterversion
    • heads of femur visible

Classification

Classification
Based on parameter
Advantages
Disadvantages/limitations
Meyerding
Slip Grade
1. Easy to use2. Can track anatomic progression over time3. Good interobserver reliability
1. Not able to predict progression2. Slip severity does correlate with severity of symptoms
Wiltse
Anatomic and etiology
Descriptive type of classification
Not able to predict progression or aid in surgical management
Marchetti-Bartolozzi
Dysplasia
1. Predicts prognosis2. Early surgical management in dysplastic type
Not able to predict progression
SDSG
Slip grade and spino-pelvic alignment
1. Guide in surgical planning2. Has been shown to have association with QOL3. Most promising classification
1. Poor interobserver reliability in Type 1–32. Difficult to identify sacral dome in dysplastic type3. Does not take into account LSK
Wiltse, Newman, and MacNab aetiological classification
  • Isthmic (Most common at L5/S1)
    • Type A: Defect in pars
    • Type B: Healed defect with elongation of pars
    • Type C: Acute bilateral fracture
  • Degenerative (Most common at L4/5)
    • Disc and facet degeneration
  • Dysplasia
    • Dysplasia of L5/S1 junction
      • Wedging of small dysplastic L5
      • Dome-shaped upper S1 vertebral border
      • Horizontal orientation of L5/S1 facets
      • Mimics isthmic type
  • Traumatic
    • Aihara classification
  • Pathological
    • Metabolic bone disease
    • Connective tissue disease
    • Infection
    • Neoplasia
The Meyerding classification
  • Low grade:
    • The end plates are parallel
    • Grading
      • Grade 1 is 1– 25%
      • Grade 2 is 26– 50%
  • High grade:
    • There is kyphosis at the listhesis level
    • Grading
      • Grade 3 is 51– 75%
      • Grade 4 is 76– 100%
      • Grade 5 is spondyloptosis
        • Severe slippage and complete malalignment of the vertebral bodies.
    • Higher chances of:
      • Progression
      • Necessitating surgery
Marchetti-Bartolozzi classification
  • Focuses on age of onset and underlying cause (developmental or acquired)
  • Acquired
    • Traumatic
      • Acute fracture
      • Stress fracture
    • Iatrogenic (Postsurgical)
      • Direct
      • Indirect
    • Pathological
      • Local
      • Systemic
    • Degenerative
      • Primary
      • Secondary
  • Developmental
    • High dysplasia
      • With/without lysis
      • With/without elongation
    • Low dysplasia
      • With/without lysis
      • With/without elongation
Spinal Deformity Study Group classification: Mac-Thiong 2008
  • This classification is not used for degenerative spondylolisthesis or L4-L5 pathology.
  • No clinical significance yet just a nomenclature for now
Type
Slip grade
Sacropelvic balance
Global spinopelvic balance
Type 1
< 50%
Low pelvic incidence (< 45°)
Type 2
< 50%
Normal pelvic incidence (45°-60°)
Type 3
< 50%
High pelvic incidence (> 60°)
Type 4
> 50%
Balanced (high sacral slope/low pelvic tilt)
Balanced (C7 plumb line between the femoral heads and sacrum)
Type 5
> 50%
Retroverted (low sacral slope/high pelvic tilt)
Unbalanced (C7 plumb line anterior to the femoral head or posterior to the sacrum)
Type 6
> 50%
Retroverted (low sacral slope/high pelvic tilt)
Unbalanced (C7 plumb line anterior to the femoral head or posterior to the sacrum)
notion image
notion image
Feature
Dysplastic (Congenital)
Lytic (Isthmic)
Pars Interarticularis
Elongated, malformed, no gap
Bilateral defect (gap)
Facet Joints
Hypoplastic, dysplastic
Normal or hypertrophic
Scotty Dog Sign X-ray
Distorted anatomy
“Collar” (lucency) present
CT Bone Detail
Malformed arch
Clear defect in pars
MRI Pars Interarticularis
No edema, structural anomaly
Gap, possible edema
Sacral Inclination
Increased, domed sacrum
Normal sacrum