Neurosurgery notes/Subacute progressive ascending myelopathy (SPAM)

Subacute progressive ascending myelopathy (SPAM)

View Details
Status
Done
logo
Parent item
RAG
RAG
MCQ
MCQ
Last edited time
Jul 25, 2026 12:14 PM GMT+0

Definition

  • Neurological deterioration ascending ≥4 vertebral levels within weeks after SCI, unrelated to mechanical instability or syrinx.

General

  • Distinguishes SPAM from acute (hours–days) and late (≥2 months) deterioration after SCI.
    • A subacute syndrome with characteristic ascending neurological level and no mechanical or syrinx‑related cause.
  • History
    • First described by Frankel in 1969 in patients with neurological levels ascending ≥4 segments after thoracolumbar fracture‑dislocation.
    • Largely unrecognised for ~30 years until a 1999 case with MRI‑confirmed SPAM after T11/12 fracture‑dislocation.
    • More cases reported over the last two decades with increasing MRI use, clarifying clinical and imaging patterns.

Numbers

  • Reports SPAM as rare
    • 33 reported patients from 13 published articles.
    • Estimated incidence of SPAM among SCI ranges from 0.42% to 1%.
  • Poor prognosis
    • Mortality ~9–10%,
    • Substantial morbidity and prolonged hospitalisation, often requiring ventilation.
  • Majority are young and middle‑aged patients;
    • about 90% are under 50 years.
  • Marked male predominance with approximately 5:1 male:female ratio.
  • Over one‑third of cases have initial injury at the thoracolumbar junction.
  • Initial injuries are usually fracture‑dislocations or burst fractures with complete paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • Most patients lack major associated injuries apart from SCI itself.

Pathophysiology

General

  • Multiple hypotheses proposed: altered CSF circulation, venous thrombosis/congestive ischaemia, hypotensive ischaemia, GAA thrombosis, infection, apoptosis, inflammatory/secondary injury, arterial thrombosis, meningitis/myelitis.
  • No single mechanism adequately explains all clinical and pathological findings.

Alteration of CSF circulation

  • SCI can acutely elevate CSF pressure, with swollen cord occluding the subarachnoid space and only partial relief from epidural decompression.
  • Postoperative MRI often shows the cord filling the subarachnoid space despite decompression.
  • Proposed that intramedullary haemorrhage, oedema and debris obstruct spinal canal drainage, causing presyrinx‑like state and cord expansion.
  • Obstructed CSF flow may lead to prolonged T2 signal change, cord oedema, and progressive myelomalacia
    • Some reversibility with decompression, duraplasty or cordectomy has been reported.
  • Persistent intrathecal pressure elevation may ultimately cause intramedullary ischaemia and irreversible deterioration.
  • Temporal pattern of SPAM fits delayed development of arachnoid tethering and CSF flow imbalance.

Artery of Adamkiewicz thrombosis

  • Suggested because many injuries occur at thoracolumbar levels where the Artery of Adamkiewicz commonly enters.
  • Arguments against:
    • Expected abrupt rather than progressive course
    • Preservation of posterior column function
    • Negative spinal angiography
    • Central (not anterior) MRI involvement
    • Lack of thromboembolus on autopsy

Venous thrombosis and congestive ischaemia

  • SCI often reverses normal haemodynamic gradient, increasing vena caval pressure and impairing valveless paravertebral venous drainage.
  • Venous congestion may preferentially affect central/posterior cord, consistent with MRI and autopsy findings.
  • Central involvement could reflect grey matter sensitivity to ischaemia; ascending course may mirror progression of venous thrombosis.
  • Some cases worsened in sitting position or with bracing, supporting a role for increased venous pressure.
  • However, venous pressure abnormalities are common after SCI whereas SPAM is rare, indicating this cannot be the sole mechanism.

Hypotensive ischaemia

  • Sustained hypotension in SCI, especially with fracture‑dislocations, associated with delayed neurological deterioration.
  • Orthostatic changes (e.g. early sitting, increased intra‑abdominal pressure) may reduce spinal perfusion and exacerbate ischaemia.
  • Some patients developed symptoms when first mobilised upright.
  • Does not fully account for progressive and ascending pattern without repeated or sustained hypotensive episodes; many SPAM patients are haemodynamically stable.

Infection

  • Supportive observations include subacute temporal course, pyrexia and poor recovery, resembling transverse myelitis.
  • Some data link early post‑SCI leucocytosis with deterioration.
  • Steroid‑responsive cases and CSF/autopsy studies showed no infectious cause, arguing against infection as the primary mechanism.

Apoptosis

  • Apoptosis of oligodendrocytes and remote apoptotic changes from initial injury site suggest a role in progression.
  • Apoptosis likely contributes to myelin degeneration and axonal dysfunction.
  • Authors consider apoptosis more a downstream process than the initiating event, given partial clinical and radiological recovery in some cases.

Other hypotheses

  • Inflammatory and secondary injury processes considered but are typically most intense immediately post‑injury and are common, whereas SPAM is delayed and rare.
  • These mechanisms alone are considered unconvincing as primary explanations.

Risk factors

  • Complete SCI, especially with fracture‑dislocation or burst fracture.
  • Injury at thoracolumbar junction.
  • Asymptomatic chronic low blood pressure.
  • Early postoperative orthostatic mobilisation.
  • Non‑surgical management of the initial SCI.
  • Surgical decompression and rigid internal fixation associated with lower incidence of neurological deterioration in SCI cohorts.

Clinical evaluation

  • SPAM typically follows a latent period of several days to weeks of clinical stability.
  • Many patients report new pain (arms, shoulders, scapula, neck, chest, trunk) preceding motor decline.
  • Other prodromal symptoms include paraesthesia, upper limb weakness, and ascending trunk numbness.
  • Fever from low‑grade to high can accompany deterioration; occasionally MRI features of SPAM appear without clear clinical change.
  • Neurological deficits may partially improve but rarely return to pre‑deterioration level.
  • In severe cases, rapid progression to complete tetraplegia and respiratory compromise can occur, sometimes within hours to days, requiring ventilation.
  • Pain may resolve spontaneously over days in some patients.
  • Diagnosis relies on careful serial neurological examination including motor, sensory, reflex and perineal assessment, with level‑specific signs (e.g. dysaesthesia in trunk/arms/hands, ascending paraplegic level, upper limb weakness, absent upper‑limb reflexes).

Investigation

Radiological evaluation

MRI

  • MRI is considered the diagnostic gold standard for SPAM.
  • Typical findings: central high T2 signal extending at least four segments above initial injury, sometimes up to 19 levels and occasionally into the medulla.
  • Lesion usually shows tapered superior extent, minimal heterogeneous T1 signal, mild–moderate cord expansion, preserved peripheral cord rim, and absence of syrinx.
  • Diffuse intrathecal haemorrhage may be present in some cases.
  • MRI changes may not strictly parallel clinical course and can appear without overt neurological deterioration.
  • Over time, MRI often improves, then later shows cord atrophy and myelomalacia with sharply circumscribed central/posterior high T2 and low T1 signal.
  • MRI‑compatible instrumentation is recommended to avoid artefact at the initial injury site.
  • Gadolinium does not substantially change diagnostic appearance.

Other modalities

  • CT myelography can show cord swelling above the initial injured level without extrinsic compression.
  • Conventional myelography may reveal diffuse cord swelling spanning a few segments around the fracture and a block at fracture level, but no significant compression above.
  • Electrophysiology (EMG, motor‑evoked potentials) can identify denervation in muscles innervated by affected segments.
  • Selective spinal angiography generally shows normal arterial anatomy without thrombosis or vascular malformation.
  • Other imaging (ultrasound of neck/vertebral vessels, chest radiograph, lung scan, brain imaging, dynamic cervical X‑rays) is typically unremarkable early in deterioration.

CSF examination

  • Lumbar puncture often demonstrates a complete or partial block below the injury, with no block at the injury level.
  • CSF commonly shows elevated protein and neutrophil counts.
  • Grossly, CSF may be turbid (“dishwater‑like”) with visible debris.
  • Cultures are negative for bacteria, parasites, viruses and tuberculosis.

Management

General

  • No definitive or evidence‑based therapy exists due to rarity and uncertain pathogenesis.
  • Management is challenging and prognosis generally poor despite interventions.

Supportive treatment

  • Emphasises strict blood pressure monitoring and maintenance in the acute SCI phase.
  • Requires close surveillance of neurological status and sensory level for early detection of deterioration.
  • Recommends bed rest to minimise orthostatic hypotension.
  • Oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation are indicated when respiratory compromise develops.

Medication therapy

  • Reported conservative therapies include anticoagulants, steroids, broad‑spectrum antibiotics and osmotic agents.
  • Anti‑apoptotic pharmacotherapy is suggested conceptually but has not been reported in clinical use for SPAM.
  • Mild neurological improvement over time is common, but no medication has shown clear benefit in functional outcome.
  • There is no consensus on optimal drug choice, dosage or duration, and deterioration has occurred despite steroid use.

Operative therapy

  • Surgical approaches aim to reduce CSF pressure and improve CSF flow in line with the CSF‑alteration hypothesis.
  • Techniques include laminectomy for epidural decompression, untethering with expansive duraplasty, and cordectomy combined with untethering.
  • These operations have been associated with halting progression and/or some neurological improvement in individual cases.
  • Laminectomy can relieve CSF block at injury; untethering and cordectomy may facilitate interstitial fluid drainage when the central canal is compromised.

Prognosis

  • SPAM carries a poor neurological prognosis overall.
  • Some patients achieve slight improvement of one or more levels below the peak level of deterioration.
  • Mortality is around 9–10%, and survivors frequently experience substantial disability and prolonged hospital stays.

Reference