Neuromonitoring

General

  • The bulk of neuromonitoring literature deals with intracranial pressure (ICP).
  • Other parameters that can be monitored include:
    • Jugular venous oxygen monitoring
    • Regional CBF
    • Brain tissue oxygen tension
    • Brain metabolites (pyruvate, lactate, glucose…)
  • The role of adjunctive monitoring is currently unknown.
  • Unanswered questions include:
    • Should neuromonitoring be disease specific (e.g. is SAH different from TBI),
    • Which monitors provide additional unique information,
    • What are the critical values of the monitored entity,
    • What interventions should be undertaken to correct abnormalities?
  • Other than ICP monitoring which shows to have some benefit in reducing mortality other types of intracranial monitoring does not have enough evidence backing its use.

Summary of techniques

Technique
Monitored variable(s)
Indications in TBI
Advantages
Disadvantages
Intracranial pressure
Intraparenchymal or subdural microsensor
ICP, CPP, Autoregulatory indices
To allow CPP optimization through derivation of PRx and ORx
Relatively easy insertion
Low procedural complication rate
Low infection risk
In vivocalibration not possible
Measures localized pressure
Small zero-drift with time
Ventricular catheter
As above
As above, plus: To allow therapeutic drainage of CSF
Measures global ICP
Therapeutic CSF drainage
In vivocalibration possible
More difficult insertion
Risk of procedure-related haemorrhage
Risk of catheter-related ventriculitis
Cerebral blood flow
Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography
Blood flow velocity, Pulsatility index, Autoregulatory indices
May detect cerebral hypoperfusion and facilitate early goal-directed therapy
Noninvasive
Can be used on an intermittent or continuous basis
Good temporal resolution
Measures relative (not absolute) CBF
Operator dependent
Failure rate in 5–10% of patients (absent acoustic window)
Little evidence base in TBI
Cerebral oxygenation
Jugular venous oximetry
Jugular venous oxygen saturation, Arterio-venous oxygen content difference
To evaluate the adequacy of cerebral perfusion and oxygen delivery
To supplement ICP/CPP-guided therapy
To assist titration of medical and surgical therapies to guide ICP/CPP therapy
Global assessment of balance between CBF and metabolism
Non-quantitative assessment of cerebral perfusion
Insensitive to regional ischemia
Risk of extracranial contamination of samples
Brain tissue pO₂
Brain tissue oxygen partial pressure, Oxygen reactivity
As for jugular venous oximetry, plus:
To allow CPP optimization through derivation of ORx
Regional assessment of balance between CBF and metabolism
Continuous
Ischaemic ‘thresholds’ defined
Minimally invasive
Measures oxygenation within a small region of interest
One hour run-in period limits intraoperative applications
Near infrared spectroscopy (cerebral oximetry)
Regional cerebral oxygen saturation, Autoregulatory indices
As for jugular venous oximetry, plus:
Detection of intracranial haematoma
Noninvasive
Real time
Multisite measurement
rScO₂-derived ‘ischaemic’ threshold not defined
Readings affected by the presence of intracranial haematoma and ‘contamination’ of signals by extracranial tissue
Little evidence base in TBI
Cerebral microdialysis
Glucose, Lactate, pyruvate, and LPR, Glycerol, Glutamate, Multiple biomarkers for research purposes
To detect cerebral ischaemia, hypoxia, cellular energy failure, and glucose deprivation
To predict the development of secondary injury before it is detectable clinically or by other monitoring modalities
To optimize CPP
To assist titration of medical therapies such as systemic glucose control
Assessment of cerebral glucose metabolism
Detection of hypoxia/ischemia
Assessment of non-ischemic causes of cellular bioenergetic dysfunction
Focal measure
Thresholds for abnormality unclear
Not continuous
Labour-intensive
Electrophysiology
EEG
Seizures, Diagnosis-specific EEG patterns, Some evidence that detection of SDs might be possible
To detect convulsive and non-convulsive seizures
To diagnose characteristic EEG patterns to facilitate prognostication
Noninvasive
Detection of non-convulsive seizures
Correlates with cerebral ischaemic and metabolic changes
Skilled interpretation required
Affected by anaesthetic and sedative agents
ECoG
Cortical SDs
To detect spreading cortical depolarizations
Currently the only method to identify SDs accurately
Highly invasive
No evidence that treatment of SDs improves outcome
Little evidence base in TBI and currently remains a research tool
For developing countries
Crevice protocol Chesnut 2020

The criteria for defining high risk of IC hypertension

  • Intracranial hypertension is suspected, and treatment is recommended in the presence of one major or two minor criteria.
    • Major criteria are:
      • Compressed cisterns (computed tomographic [CT] classification of Marshall diffuse injury III).
      • Midline shift >5 mm (Marshall diffuse injury IV)
      • Non-evacuated mass lesion.
    • Minor criteria are:
      • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score ≤4
      • Pupillary asymmetry
      • Abnormal pupillary reactivity
      • CT classification of Marshall diffuse injury II (i.e., basal cisterns are present with midline shift 0–5 mm and/or high- or mixed-density lesion ≤25 cm³)

Performance of the rule in a LATAM Cohort of sTBI

  • When high ICP is defined as >22mm Hg
    • Performance
      High ICP
      Normal ICP
      Rule positive
      61
      49
      Rule negative
      4
      36
      Sensitivity
      93.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 85.0–98.3%)
      93.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 85.0–98.3%)
      Specificity
      42.4% (95%CI: 31.7–53.6%)
      42.4% (95%CI: 31.7–53.6%)
      Positive predictive value
      55.5% (95%CI: 50.7–60.2%)
      55.5% (95%CI: 50.7–60.2%)
      Negative predictive value
      90.0% (95%CI: 77.1–96.0%)
      90.0% (95%CI: 77.1–96.0%)
      Positive likelihood ratio
      1.6 (95%CI: 1.3–2.0)
      1.6 (95%CI: 1.3–2.0)
      Negative likelihood ratio
      0.2 (95%CI: 0.1–0.4)
      0.2 (95%CI: 0.1–0.4)

Definition of neuroworsening and protocol activation indications

  • Escalation of therapy (or adding another treatment) was considered if:
      1. Neuroworsening:
          • Decrease in the motor GCS of 1 or more points
          • New loss of pupil reactivity.
          • Interval development of pupil asymmetry of >2 mm or bilateral mydriasis
          • New focal motor deficit
          • Herniation syndrome (e.g., Cushing's triad)
      1. No improvement or worsening on follow-up CT imaging
      1. No acceptable response to initial therapy
  • The “modified definition of neuroworsening” includes signs of the herniation syndrome (e.g. Cushing’s triad) and a lower threshold for GCS motor score deterioration (≥ 1 point).
  • Neuroworsening requires an immediate therapeutic response.

CT time

  • The consensus modified the ICE protocol CT imaging schedule.
  • If the initial CT is obtained within 4h of injury, a second CT is indicated within the next 12h.
  • In all cases, follow-up CT imaging is recommended at 24 and 72h after injury, and as needed based on the clinical situation or to facilitate decision making.
notion image

Tier therapy

  • Tier 1
    • Scheduled hypertonic saline (for example, every 4 hours)
    • Scheduled Mannitol (for example, every 4 hours)
    • Maintain normothermia (threshold = 37.5º)
  • Tier 2
    • Hyperventilation, PaCO₂ = 30–35 mmHg, corrected for altitude
    • Hypertonic saline 3% by continuous infusion
    • Increase in sedation
  • Tier 3
    • Decompressive craniectomy
    • High dose IV barbiturates
    • Hypothermia (central temperature range <37ºC)