Primary intracranial sarcoma, DICER1-mutant

View Details
Status
Done

Definition

  • Primary intracranial sarcoma, DICER1-mutant is a primary intracranial sarcoma composed of spindled or pleomorphic tumour cells.
  • These tumours are genetically defined by mutations in the DICER1 gene, occurring either somatically or as part of the germline DICER1 syndrome.

Diagnostic criteria

  • Essential criteria
    • A primary intracranial sarcoma AND
    • A pathogenic DICER1 mutation, which may be either germline or somatic. AND
    • For unresolved lesions, a DNA methylation profile aligned with primary intracranial sarcoma, DICER1-mutant is also an essential criterion.

Numbers

  • The median age at diagnosis is 6 years, with a reported range from 2 to 76 years.
  • The sex distribution is reported to be almost equal.
  • This is an exceptionally rare tumour with limited clinical data available.

WHO grade

  • This tumour type is assigned a CNS WHO grade of 4.

Histopathology

Macroscopic

  • These tumours are typically unifocal and relatively circumscribed.
  • They tend to be firm and frequently feature haemorrhage.

Microscopic

  • The tumours are malignant neoplasms composed of pleomorphic or spindle cells arranged in fascicles or disorganized sheets.
  • Characteristic features include cytoplasmic eosinophilic globules and a myxoid stroma.
  • Foci of myogenic or cartilaginous differentiation may be present, with some tumours showing frank malignant cartilage.
  • There is typically abundant intercellular basement membrane deposition.
These tumours frequently contain cells with prominent eosinophilic cytoplasmic globules.
These tumours frequently contain cells with prominent eosinophilic cytoplasmic globules.
These tumours are typically composed of pleomorphic spindle cells arranged in fascicles or disorganized sheets. Brisk mitotic activity and eosinophilic cytoplasmic globules are common features.
These tumours are typically composed of pleomorphic spindle cells arranged in fascicles or disorganized sheets. Brisk mitotic activity and eosinophilic cytoplasmic globules are common features.

Immunophenotype

  • The tumours usually show immunophenotypic evidence of myogenic differentiation, most frequently with desmin and SMA expression.
  • Expression of myogenin is typically limited or absent, which serves as a feature to distinguish the entity from rhabdomyosarcoma.
  • The tumours frequently demonstrate nuclear positivity for TLE1 and loss of H3 p.K28me3.
  • They are generally negative for GFAP, OLIG2, cytokeratins, EMA, S100, SOX10, and SOX2.
  • Loss of ATRX expression or aberrant p53 accumulation resulting from TP53 mutation may be seen.

Pathogenesis

  • Genetic disruption of the DICER1 gene, which encodes a microRNA-processing enzyme → allows aberrant oncofetal transcriptional programmes to persist beyond fetal development.
    • Mutations are most often a hotspot missense mutation in the RNase IIIb domain on one allele combined with a truncating mutation occurring in trans on the other allele.
  • Most tumours also show disruption of p53 signalling via inactivating mutations in the TP53 gene and ATRX mutation or deletion.
  • Activation of the MAPK signalling pathway is common through mutations in KRAS, NF1, or PDGFRA.

Localisation

  • The characteristic localisation is intracranial, frequently in supratentorial forebrain regions.
  • There is typically involvement of the leptomeninges and sometimes the dura.

Clinical features

  • Symptoms depend on the specific brain region involved and include headaches, seizures, or focal neurological signs.

Radiological features

  • Imaging typically reveals a heterogeneously enhancing mass with dural involvement and marked mass effect.
  • The tumours are iso- to hyperintense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images.
notion image

Management

  • Management generally relies on radical operative resection
  • Spinal imaging and sampling of the cerebrospinal fluid should be considered for staging.

Prognosis

  • The prognosis for patients with this tumour remains unknown due to the limited clinical data available.
  • An aggressive clinical course is suspected, though long-term follow-up data are not yet sufficient for reliable conclusions.
  • No specific prognostic or predictive factors have been reported to date.